Moving artificial intelligence (AI) from individual applications and pilots to widespread use across a health system requires more than implementing the technology. Health systems also need to determine which problems warrant the use of AI, how it fits into clinical and operational workflows, and whether the organization has the infrastructure to support it, according to Cleveland Clinic executive leaders during a recently held roundtable discussion at Cleveland Clinic's A.I. Summit for Healthcare Professionals. Moderated by Scott R. Steele, MD, MBA, FACS, FASCRS, president of the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus Submarket, the conversation explored how Cleveland Clinic approaches these and other challenges to scaling AI.
Why do successful AI pilots struggle to scale?
One of the central questions asked of the panel was why an AI application that works successfully as a pilot may prove more difficult to implement across a health system.
According to Rohit Chandra, PhD, executive vice president and chief digital officer, health care’s complexity makes scaling fundamentally different from testing a technology in a limited setting. He said it’s essential that technology introduced into clinical or near-clinical environments make every caregiver’s work easier.
“It’s easy to implement an idea, try it out, and do something interesting,” Dr. Chandra said. “But when you’re driving this flavor of technology adoption at [Cleveland Clinic's] size and scale, we have to be appreciative of the fact that we’re trying to improve the habits, the behaviors, the lives, the culture, and the processes of tens of thousands of clinical caregivers.”
Scaling therefore requires understanding existing work, determining how technology can improve it, training caregivers, and managing the transition toward new standards of care.
“Just the change management involved at our size and scale is essential if you want to accomplish improving the care that we provide, but it doesn’t come easy,” Dr. Chandra said.
The discussion then turned to how health systems decide which projects are worth scaling in the first place. Asked how Cleveland Clinic chooses among competing pilots and proposals, Dr. Chandra said the organization begins with its enterprise strategic objectives, including making health care safer, more affordable, and more scalable. Potential applications are then evaluated based on their potential impact on patients, caregivers, or the organization, he said.
Jorge A. Guzman, MD, executive vice president of U.S. markets, described a similar framework when explaining how Cleveland Clinic determines which opportunities offer the greatest value. He said decisions are based on the magnitude of challenges involving quality improvement, patient and caregiver experience, access, and affordability. “We try to identify what are the biggest challenges we’re trying to overcome, the impact that we’re going to achieve by doing that, and then figure out how we fund it and prioritize [implementation].”
What investments are needed for enterprise AI?
Beyond selecting which applications to pursue, health systems must determine whether they have the infrastructure needed to deploy AI more broadly.
Tomislav Mihaljevic, MD, chief executive officer and president and the Morton L. Mandel CEO chair, pointed out that implementing a defined AI application is considerably different from integrating AI throughout a health system.
“The implementation of artificial intelligence for discrete tasks in health care is relatively straightforward,” he said. “What is not so easy is to integrate AI at the enterprise level on multiple different parts of the enterprise and make it all make sense.”
Dr. Mihaljevic identified three layers of enterprise readiness: data, computing infrastructure, and applications. He also emphasized the growing importance of cybersecurity as health systems become more reliant on technology. “We know that the [cyber] attacks are going to happen. There is absolutely no doubt about it.” He said Cleveland Clinic is considering how to segment its technology ecosystems so that [a cyber] attack would 'limit the blast radius' and affected areas could be identified and fixed quickly.
Dr. Mihaljevic said broader AI implementation could also require reimagining the health-care delivery ecosystem. Rather than adding AI on top of existing processes, he suggested that health systems begin with an “AI-first” approach. However, he added that doing so raises questions about which tasks AI cannot perform, which require human involvement, and what work environment would best support a redesigned model of care.
What technological capabilities will be most critical?
When the panel was asked what technological capabilities would be most important to future AI implementation, Dr. Chandra identified two priorities: AI-ready data and the ability to experiment rapidly. “Data is actually the oil that powers AI,” he said.
Dr. Chandra explained that Cleveland Clinic has petabytes of data, a volume that continues to grow daily, but making that information usable by AI requires bringing it together in an AI-ready form. He described that process as “easier said than done” but said AI-ready data are a “critical enabler” of health care and administrative transformation. He cited patient charts, supply-chain information, and administrative contracts as examples of clinical and nonclinical data that need to be made accessible to AI tools.
Dr. Chandra also said health systems need the ability to test multiple approaches and conduct experiments more rapidly. “Technology is evolving at a rapid pace,” he said. “Health care needs to find a way to accelerate the exploration, the experimentation, and the learning.”
What misconceptions could hinder AI implementation?
In a closing question, the panelists were asked to identify the biggest misconception about AI in health care. Their responses emphasized the importance of realistic expectations about what technology can solve.
Kelly Hancock, DNP, RN, NE-BC, FAAN, executive vice president, chief caregiver officer, and chief administrative officer, said one misconception is that AI will provide a solution to all of health care’s problems, describing the idea as “magical dust.”
Miguel Regueiro, MD, executive vice president and enterprise chief of staff, emphasized the need for health systems to prepare for AI implementation. “We need to be ready for what’s coming and not stick our head in the sand, the ostrich mentality,” he said.
Dr. Guzman pointed to patient access to care as an example of a challenge that technology alone cannot address. “Access is not a technology problem,” he said. “It’s a workflow problem. It’s a culture problem.”
