Objective:

To urge the medical community to reconsider the use of the term 'provider' when referring to physicians due to ethical, professional, and practical concerns.

Approach:

Key Findings:

• The term 'provider' emerged in the 1960s with Medicare and Medicaid and has since obscured differences in clinician roles.
• Referring to physicians as 'providers' risks framing the patient-physician relationship as transactional.
• Language influences professional identity and behavior, potentially leading to 'deprofessionalization' in medicine.

Interpretation:

The use of the term 'provider' may undermine the ethical foundations of the patient-physician relationship and affect patient understanding and trust.

Limitations:

• The paper does not address the complexities of multidisciplinary team dynamics in detail.
• It may not account for the varying perceptions of the term 'provider' across different health care settings.

Conclusion:

Language in health care carries ethical significance and should reflect professional identity and accountability, promoting patient-centered care.

Sources:

• Annals of Internal Medicine
Attribution Notice

This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.