Clinical Scorecard: Keratoplasty may salvage severe corneal melt
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
|---|---|
| Condition | Severe presumed polymicrobial keratitis with progressive corneal melt, involving culture-confirmed Pseudomonas aeruginosa and suspected Acanthamoeba infection |
| Key Mechanisms | Progressive corneal infection and inflammation were associated with stromal thinning, tissue dissolution, epithelial defect, and corneal neovascularization. |
| Target Population | A single 27-year-old patient with severe, treatment-refractory keratitis and progressive corneal destruction |
| Care Setting | Specialist cornea and transplant care, including microbiological and imaging assessment, intensive antimicrobial treatment, and therapeutic corneal surgery |
Key Highlights
- Corneal scrapings and contact lens cultures grew P aeruginosa susceptible to amikacin and ceftazidime.
- Acanthamoeba PCR was negative, while in vivo confocal microscopy showed cystic structures suggestive of infection.
- After about 2.5 months of intensive antibacterial and antiamoebic treatment, corneal instability and neovascularization progressed.
- Therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty with adjunctive intrastromal bevacizumab was followed by a stable, clear graft and no reported recurrent infection at 3 months.
- Pinhole visual acuity improved to 6/10 at the 3-month postoperative assessment; the single case cannot establish the independent effect of bevacizumab.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
- In this case, assessment included slit-lamp examination, corneal and contact lens cultures, PCR testing, and in vivo confocal microscopy.
- The authors noted that negative Acanthamoeba PCR did not eliminate clinical suspicion when confocal microscopy showed suggestive cystic structures.
Management
- Initial treatment included intensive topical amikacin and vancomycin, intravenous ceftazidime, and oral tetracycline; polyhexamethylenebiguanide and hexamidine were added for suspected Acanthamoeba infection.
- Therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty was performed after progressive disease and substantial risk of perforation despite prolonged antimicrobial treatment.
- Intrastromal bevacizumab was administered during surgery and twice during follow-up to address neovascularization; because it was used with keratoplasty, the report cannot establish its independent effect.
- Postoperative treatment included oral ciprofloxacin, topical ofloxacin, tapering topical dexamethasone, and ocular lubricants.
Monitoring & Follow-up
- The clinical course was assessed with slit-lamp examinations and confocal microscopy; postoperative assessment included corneal tomography and endothelial cell analysis.
- At 3 months, the graft was clear and structurally stable, with reduced neovascularization and no reported recurrent infection or graft rejection.
Risks
- Progressive stromal thinning and tissue dissolution raised concern for corneal perforation and loss of structural integrity.
- The report describes one patient; suspected Acanthamoeba infection was not PCR-confirmed, excised tissue was not examined histopathologically, and follow-up was limited to 3 months.
Patient & Prescribing Data
A 27-year-old woman with severe left-eye keratitis who wore monthly soft contact lenses and reported extended use, occasional overnight wear, and inconsistent replacement of storage solution.
After about 2.5 months of intensive antibacterial and antiamoebic therapy, progressive corneal destruction led to therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. Intrastromal bevacizumab was given at 1.25 mg/0.05 mL during surgery and in two additional postoperative injections.
Clinical Best Practices
- In this case, microbiological and imaging findings were considered together despite discordant PCR and confocal microscopy findings.
- The authors advised that surgical escalation, including therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty, should be considered promptly in complex refractory cases.
- Interpret the reported postoperative outcome cautiously: keratoplasty and bevacizumab were used together, and longer-term graft outcomes were not reported.
Related Resources & Content
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.
