Objective:
To investigate the influence of biological sex on postoperative outcomes following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Approach:
- Study Design: A review conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, analyzing studies published from December 2015 through December 2025.
- Data Sources: Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies comparing postoperative outcomes between women and men undergoing THA.
- Inclusion Criteria: Twenty-six studies involving over 2.3 million patients were included, primarily retrospective cohort or registry-based analyses.
- Outcome Assessment: Outcomes assessed included revision surgery, complications, discharge disposition, patient-reported outcomes, and functional recovery.
Key Findings:
- Women had a higher risk of revision surgery, especially younger patients and older patients with uncemented fixation.
- A national cohort reported a 2-year revision rate of approximately 3% in women compared to 2% in men.
- Women experienced higher rates of surgical complications, including periprosthetic femoral fracture and surgical site infection.
- Men had higher rates of early medical complications, including cardiac events and acute kidney injury.
- Optimal implant selection varied by sex and age, with cemented stems linked to lower reoperation rates in older women.
Interpretation:
Biological sex interacts with age, implant design, fixation strategy, and comorbidity burden to influence postoperative risk and recovery.
Limitations:
- 90% of studies were retrospective, with moderate risk of bias.
- Outcome definitions and follow-up periods varied significantly across studies.
- Many studies did not account for bone mineral density, hormonal status, or activity level.
Conclusion:
Sex significantly modulates postoperative outcomes following THA through complex interactions with various factors, highlighting the need for prospective studies.
Sources:
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.
