Objective:
To examine the effects of nasal obstruction and mouth taping on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) indicators.
Approach:
- Study Search: Investigators searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and CINAHL for relevant studies.
- Study Inclusion: The review included 17 studies with 354 adult participants, focusing on nasal obstruction and mouth taping.
- Meta-Analysis: 15 studies (n = 304) were included in the meta-analysis of nasal obstruction; 2 studies on mouth taping were reviewed narratively.
- Outcome Measures: Outcomes included Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI), and oxygen saturation levels.
- Statistical Analysis: Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted when at least 3 studies reported comparable outcomes.
Key Findings:
- Nasal obstruction was associated with a mean AHI increase of 13.78 events per hour.
- The increase in AHI varied by baseline AHI: 9.56 events per hour for AHI < 5, and 24.11 events per hour for AHI ≥ 5.
- Nasal obstruction was associated with a mean ODI increase of 7.45 events per hour, which was not statistically significant.
- Average oxygen saturation decreased by 0.70 percentage points, and nadir oxygen saturation decreased by 1.75 percentage points, although these reductions were characterized as not clinically meaningful.
- Both mouth taping studies showed a decrease in AHI but did not achieve statistically significant improvements in oxygen saturation.
Interpretation:
Acute nasal obstruction is associated with worsening sleep apnea indicators.
Limitations:
- Most studies were observational, limiting causal interpretation.
- Study populations and methods varied substantially.
- Definitions of hypopnea were inconsistent, potentially affecting pooled estimates.
- Only 3 studies were rated as good quality; 8 as fair, and 6 as poor.
Conclusion:
The evidence suggests that nasal obstruction worsens OSA indicators.
Sources:
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.
