Objective:
To review current evidence on the epidemiology, virology, viral entry mechanisms, virus-host interactions, clinical diagnosis, and management of enterovirus (EV) infections in children.
Approach:
- Epidemiology and Virology: Investigators synthesized recent advances and barriers to diagnosis, treatment, antiviral development, and vaccination across various pediatric EV infections.
- Molecular Testing: Molecular testing, particularly reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction, has become central to EV diagnosis, with high sensitivity but potential for false negatives due to genetic diversity.
- Clinical Management: Management of EV infections remains primarily supportive and symptomatic, with investigational approaches targeting various viral mechanisms.
- Vaccine Development: The study highlighted the progress and limitations of current vaccines, particularly the inactivated EV-A71 vaccine, and the need for multivalent and broad-spectrum vaccines.
Key Findings:
- EVs account for about 58% of meningitis or encephalitis cases in children.
- Most pediatric patients with EV-related central nervous system disease recover within 3 to 7 days.
- No antiviral drug has been approved for routine clinical use against EV infections.
- The inactivated EV-A71 vaccine has shown over 90% efficacy against severe HFMD but limited efficacy against milder symptoms.
Interpretation:
The diversity and rapid evolution of enteroviruses complicate prevention and control, with significant challenges in developing effective treatments and vaccines.
Limitations:
- Genetic diversity can lead to primer mismatches in molecular testing.
- Limited efficacy and emergence of resistance have stalled clinical development of several antiviral candidates.
- Vaccines for other human EV infections remain unavailable.
Conclusion:
Future research should prioritize broad-spectrum agents with high resistance barriers and acceptable pediatric safety.
Sources:
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.
